"ΕΠΙΤΟΜΕΙΣ"

ΤΟΥ ΠΑΝΕΛΛΗΝΙΟΥ ΣΥΝΔΕΣΜΟΥ ΑΝΔΡΩΝ

"ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΤΗΣ"

ΤΟΥ ΠΑΝΕΛΛΗΝΙΟΥ ΣΥΝΔΕΣΜΟΥ ΑΝΔΡΩΝ

"ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΤΗΣ"

WOMEN'S BEHAVIOR BRIFFAULT'S LAW FEMINISM GOOD EVIL FEMINISM FEMINIST VAWA FRAUD

"ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΤΗΣ"

"ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΤΗΣ"

"ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΤΗΣ"

WOMEN'S BEHAVIOR BRIFFAULT'S LAW FEMINISM GOOD EVIL FEMINISM FEMINIST VAWA FRAUD

Women's Behavior Briffault's Law Feminism Good Evil Feminism Feminist VAWA Fraud

BRIFFAULT'S LAW:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.

Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit.

A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not at all likely).

Why do women do what they do, or more precisely, how they are capable of some of the things they do after all we have done for them? I will admit to a life-long, and fruitless, search for the answers to these seemingly eternal mysteries. Fruitless that is, until now.

In my research of all things on the net I came upon a truly remarkable statement that explains much, if not all, female behavior.

Freud said that no one knows what women want. That opinion remains true, as far as I can tell. Like all truly great discoveries, such as E=MC2, what I found that explains the unified field theory of women's behavior is elegantly simple. What I found was Briffault's Law.

Robert Briffault was a novelist, historian, social anthropologist, and a surgeon. He was born in Nice, France of a French father and a Scottish mother. After the death of his father, Briffault and his Scottish-born mother immigrated to New Zealand. In May 1896 he married Anna Clarke; the couple had three children, Lister, Muriel, and Joan, born from 1897 to 1901. Briffault received his Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery from the University of Dunedin in New Zealand in 1905 and commenced medical practice. After service on the Western Front during World War I, he settled in England, his wife having died. In the late 1920s he married again, to Herma Hoyt, an American writer and translator. The point of this is to state the credentials of the author and to show that this law has been there for many years - we just needed to find it.

No man can ever understand what is going on inside the head of any woman, of any culture, including their own, no matter how much they study. We should not kid ourselves.

This is where Briffault's Law is vital. All women associate with any man only so long as they derive a benefit from the association. This cannot be stated too many times.

A bit of recent data that supports this proposition comes from a recent study done in the UK. The findings were that for a period from the early 1990's to the early 2000's, 90% of UK women practiced hypergamy. Hypergamy means marrying up. The hypothesis in the study was; do women exhibit hypergamy, or not. If they do not, then roughly 50% would marry up and 50% would marry down. During the period of the study 90% of UK women married men that made more money than they did, or had greater wealth. The 90% marrying up rate provides ample evidence that the women exhibit hypergamy behavior. This behavior could be observed anywhere in the world and at any time in history.

So, let's get to the question, "Who is a Whore", and my initial response, "They all are". By Briffault's Law if a woman is associating with you - assuming you are a man - then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association. Guys, let's get real about this. It is past time to take off the rose colored glasses.

How does this help? If you know going in that she is there to derive a benefit, then make sure you are willing and able to provide that benefit, that you are willing and able to continue to provide that benefit, and that the cost to you of providing that benefit is worth the benefit you derive from the association. Be fully aware that when the benefit to her stops, the relationship will stop.

But do not have the illusion that continuing to provide benefits to your female partner is a guarantee for a continued relationship. Many females leave their male partners as soon as they think they can get more somewhere else -- with another man, at a different place, from the government etc., or for the simple reason of being bored.

Have no illusions. This is true in the UK, France, America, Thailand, and everywhere else. So, if you spend every dime in your retirement fund to build her and/or her mother a house in her name, do not expect that the association will continue. You must say no early and often so you preserve your ability to provide a continuing benefit. If you drain all your resources, then you get what you should expect.